The ignored ST side of sub-classification debate
Kumar, Sujit (2024) The ignored ST side of sub-classification debate. Deccan Herald.
|
Text
Restricted to Registered users only Download (94kB) |
Abstract
The dust around the debate of sub-classification of Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) does not seem to be settling anytime soon. While several state governments have spoken favourably about it, many have also opposed it, and some have maintained a silence on the matter. The sub-classification which was declared constitutional by the Supreme Court of India is aimed at addressing the intra-group inequalities among STs and SCs. State governments, if convinced about the ‘inadequate representation’ of groups within these two categories, can go for the sub-classification. In the past, Adivasi organisations in different states have demanded the exclusion of groups, like the Lambadas and Minas, from the state ST list without demanding a sub-classification. Litigations that led to the apex court verdict were also exclusively related to the issue of sub-classification among SCs.
| Item Type: | Newspaper Article |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Kumar, Sujit |
| Document Language: | Language English |
| Subjects: | Social sciences > Sociology & anthropology > Groups of people Social sciences > Groups of people |
| Divisions: | Azim Premji University - Bengaluru > School of Development |
| Full Text Status: | Restricted |
| Related URLs: | |
| URI: | http://publications.azimpremjiuniversity.edu.in/id/eprint/5863 |
| Publisher URL: |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |


PlumX Metrics
PlumX Metrics